| PML releases new Co-Pilot Version 2.0 recovery altimeter |
|
|
|
| 2008 Archived News by Planet News | |
| Saturday, September 13, 2008 | |
|
The Co-Pilot v2.0 provides two-stage barometrically-controlled (pressure-sensing) deployment of rocket recovery systems and equipment. Using the Co-Pilot v2.0 altimeter and CPR3000 technology, a small drogue or streamer is deployed at apogee allowing for a fast but controlled descent. At a user-selectable lower altitude, the altimeter fires a second charge to deploy the main chute allowing for a soft landing. This system allows a high-altitude flight to be returned much closer to the launch area than if the main chute were deployed at apogee. The Co-Pilot v2.0 is a very rugged and reliable unit in both design and construction. The Co-Pilot v2.0 uses a standard 9 volt alkaline battery, and has clearly-marked terminals for connecting the On/Off switch and the Drogue and Main deployment charges. The Co-Pilot v2.0 is also clearly labeled “Fore” (toward nosecone) and “Aft” (toward fins) to aid in proper mounting. Physical and Operational Features:
Functional, Diagnostic, and Data Features:
Website: http://www.publicmissiles.com/ |
| << Previous Article | Next Article >> |
|---|
Kevin
Kevin
I don't know...Smaller maybe? I would be interested to see what PML says for the operational temperature range. Glancing though the manual I did not see anything in the specs.
-DAllen
Kevin
Does the RR2 have a couple of different "profiles" that you can program in and select which you fly on-the-fly?
My question is why, if it's a baro altimeter, it matters whether you mount one end Fore or Aft, or even mount it sideways?
My question is why, if it's a baro altimeter, it matters whether you mount one end Fore or Aft, or even mount it sideways?
When used with the CPR system, the onboard 9v battery is forced away from the contacts if the altimeter orientation is reversed. The original RRC2 instructions also advised one to orient the altimeter so the battery was above the electronics. I never realized that and used it the other way for years with no problems
-DAllen
So, here is where the CoPilot v2.0 differs from the RRC2 Mini:
- Drop in fit for use with CPR mounts
- Integral battery holder
- side facing terminal strip.
Is that worth $50? If you have quite a few rockets with the CPR system, like I do, it may be. Otherwise I am going to have to build some carrier boards or convert all my CPR rockets to something else. The thing is, I like the CPR system for small diameter rockets.As Steve mentioned the mounting holes for the version 2.0 are in the same location as the holes for orignal version. I just checked this fact and it is correct. I did not like the CPR 3000 system so I have used my own ebay in my Eclipse. I do like the PML ejection charge holders and I have been buying and using them all the time.
Bob
As Steve mentioned the mounting holes for the version 2.0 are in the same location as the holes for orignal version. I just checked this fact and it is correct. I did not like the CPR 3000 system so I have used my own ebay in my Eclipse. I do like the PML ejection charge holders and I have been buying and using them all the time.
Bob
Bob
When used with the CPR system, the onboard 9v battery is forced away from the contacts if the altimeter orientation is reversed. The original RRC2 instructions also advised one to orient the altimeter so the battery was above the electronics. I never realized that and used it the other way for years with no problems
Don't forget that if a charge is located above the av-bay, the g-loading opposite from the motor direction will typically be much higher than what you get from the motor. If the charge above the av-bay is the main chute, then no problem if the altimeter resets. But even for an apogee deployment beneath the av-bay, the jerk from the shock cord going tight commonly causes Gs higher than what you get from the motor thrust, and in the opposite direction.