TMT announces new motor certifications for Loki, Gorilla
2009 Archived News by Tripoli Motor Testing
Thursday, June 25, 2009
We are very pleased to announce new motor certifications from two manufacturers. At the final test session prior to the start of LDRS week, held on the 20th of June, we certified four new motors, one from Gorilla Motors, three from Loki Research.
From Gorilla, we have certified the first of two new loads for his 75-3500 case.
The L425WC-PS is a 31% L, in a Moon-Burner geometry with Jim Harris's very smooth, aluminized propellant. The Thrust profile is an immediate rise to 173 pounds, dropping to 135 lbs, with a flat line to the 2 second point, then a straight line to 0 at the 8 second point.
Total Impulse 3372 Total NS (32% L) Max Thrust 172.96 Average Thrust 424.18 Average Burn Time 7.95 seconds Propellant Weight 1837 g Total Weight 3742 g
Loki Research is continuing its return to the certification process with a vengeance.
First off is the final sparky motor of the first half of the year, the G69SF-17A. This motor is not your typical G Sparky as it uses Jeff's LifeSaver style 1X1 grain geometry, utilizing two of these grains in his 38-120 NS case for a 33% G.
Total Impulse 106.1 (33% G) Max Thrust 99.6 Average Thrust 87.17 Burn Time 1.589 sec Propellant Weight 63 g Total Weight 239 g
Next up is the first of a set of two monster motors. The M3000LW-PS is Jeff's first certified motor in his unique 75-8000 snap-ring case. This 74% M motor starts with a 1050 lb rise at start, with a regress to 850 lbs at the .5 second point. This motor then has a slight rise from that point to 875 lbs at 1.2 seconds. The curve returns on a straight line to zero at the 3 second point
Total Impulse 8924.3 NS (74% M) Max Thrust 4752.19 N Average Thrust 2920.9 N Burn Time 3.059 Propellant Weight 4350 g Total Weight 7166.7 g
Last but by no means least, is the second biggest motor we've tested in the past few years. The N3800LW-PS motor is a 25.6 pound (11611 g) motor in Jeff's new 98-12500 (4" X 41") case. Many will be familiar with this motor as it was the "N's" in the April Saturn V launch by Steve Eves. This motor ignites to 1000 lbs, with a short flatline at that point to .7 second point, where it then progressively rises to the max point of 1120 lbs at the 1.5 second point, then pretty much a straight drop to zero at the 3.248 second point, with a "knuckle" at the 600 pound point at 2.84 seconds.
Total Impulse 12490.28 NS Max Thrust 5148 N Average Thrust 3850.82 Burn Time 3.249 Propellant Weight 6124 g Total Weight 11611 g
We wish great success to both manufacturer's and congratulate them on these new motors.
Our next test session is preliminarily scheduled for the first part of September as it is HOT here in Texas right now and the test field crop of corn is drying out fast.!
H. Paul Holmes Chairman, Tripoli Motor Testing
Reader comments:
#1Re: Article: TMT announces new motor certifications for Loki, Gorilla
Awesome
Another sparky G motor, I might just have to check this one out.
#3Re: Article: TMT announces new motor certifications for Loki, Gorilla
What makes you think there was no drama?
The current rules where a motor can fall in between "model rocket motor" and "high power model rocket motor" are a bit silly in my opinion. The Loki G motor initially had this problem. It wasn't a "high power" motor because the propellant weight was under 62.5g and the average thrust was under 81Ns. It wasn't a "model rocket motor" because it emits sparks. To get it certified, I had to add propellant to get the weight up to 63g. If ATF permits were still required, I'd be screaming, but since ATF worries are gone, it doesn't matter so much.
#4Re: Article: TMT announces new motor certifications for Loki, Gorilla
Quote:
What makes you think there was no drama?
My bad! I guess I was projecting hopefulness.
Quote:
The current rules where a motor can fall in between "model rocket motor" and "high power model rocket motor" are a bit silly in my opinion. The Loki G motor initially had this problem. It wasn't a "high power" motor because the propellant weight was under 62.5g and the average thrust was under 81Ns. It wasn't a "model rocket motor" because it emits sparks. To get it certified, I had to add propellant to get the weight up to 63g. If ATF permits were still required, I'd be screaming, but since ATF worries are gone, it doesn't matter so much.
I agree. It is a no-man's land where there are no defined rules to follow.
Unlike when a motor's certification has expired. A while ago.
And we recertify them ... based ... on ... what? Rules?
#5Re: Article: TMT announces new motor certifications for Loki, Gorilla
I've forgotten all the details from the previous time this arose, but why is the sparkiness of a motor treated differently than, say, the under 62.5g G motors with average impulse over 80 NS?
#6Re: Article: TMT announces new motor certifications for Loki, Gorilla
NFPA sets the rules to what is a model rocket motor and what is a high power rocket motor. The other motor (CTI G69 Sparky) didn't meet any of the requirements to be a high power motor but it produced sparks and NFPA says that a model rocket motor can't produce sparks. This puts the motor in limbo between high power and model. To fix this, you add propellant mass to bump it past the minimum for a high power motor (like the AT G75 or G33)
NFPA should be fixed to correct this. I think they should remove the sparky part of the limitation to a model rocket motor but I could also agree to a "catch-all" that promotes motors that don't meet the model rocket motor limits to be treated as high power motors similar to G hybrids.
#9Re: Article: TMT announces new motor certifications for Loki, Gorilla
LDRS is gonna be wild! There are so many new motors! I'm pumped, I leave for NY on Monday morning, right after a couple days of launching at our home launch here in Lethbridge, Alberta
Another sparky G motor, I might just have to check this one out.
Yeah, and without certification drama either.
The current rules where a motor can fall in between "model rocket motor" and "high power model rocket motor" are a bit silly in my opinion. The Loki G motor initially had this problem. It wasn't a "high power" motor because the propellant weight was under 62.5g and the average thrust was under 81Ns. It wasn't a "model rocket motor" because it emits sparks. To get it certified, I had to add propellant to get the weight up to 63g. If ATF permits were still required, I'd be screaming, but since ATF worries are gone, it doesn't matter so much.
My bad! I guess I was projecting hopefulness.
Unlike when a motor's certification has expired. A while ago.
And we recertify them ... based ... on ... what? Rules?
NFPA should be fixed to correct this. I think they should remove the sparky part of the limitation to a model rocket motor but I could also agree to a "catch-all" that promotes motors that don't meet the model rocket motor limits to be treated as high power motors similar to G hybrids.
-Aaron
Your life must be like mine.