| TMT certifies 38mm RMS adapter system, 5 new reloads |
|
|
|
| 2009 Archived News by AeroTech Consumer Aerospace | |
| Monday, October 26, 2009 | |
|
38mm RMS Reload Adapter System N3300R-PS Reload Kit For 98/15360 Hardware 75/5120 and 98/7680 KEB Signature Line New Blue Thunder Reloads J99N-P Endburning Reload for 54/852 Hardware New 38/1320 Motor Case and J510W-L Reload AeroTech anticipates that shipments of the new products to its dealers will begin within 2-6 weeks. Motor instructions, assembly drawings and the official TRA certification documents for the five new reloads will soon be available for download in PDF format from the AeroTech Resource Library at http://www.aerotech-rocketry.com/. AeroTech Consumer Aerospace is a division of RCS Rocket Motor Components, Inc., Cedar City, UT. |
| << Previous Article | Next Article >> |
|---|
It will be interesting to compare Cesaroni's J530 and J420 against the new Aerotech J. Based on the total impulse and total length, it should be close. I would expect that Kurt Von Delius could break 20kft with any of those 3 motors. I'll probably take a shot at it myself next spring.
Is this an oddball new case? 1320? One load, right?
This is pretty close to the CTI J530 Imax. Within 20ns certified (nothing) and the CTI case must have about 5 loads for it. So for people who are real AT junkies I presume this is a welcome offering. For records geeks they probably have a wide variety of options anyway in this range. For sport whatever floats your boat, but 5 choices vs. 1.
So AT got the casing spacer thing certified. That's good for users. CTI really was first with that and actually has more choices (38, 54, 75, and 98) already certified by CAR.
So many choices so few members.
Jerry
This is pretty close to the CTI J530 Imax. Within 20ns certified (nothing) and the CTI case must have about 5 loads for it. So for people who are real AT junkies I presume this is a welcome offering. For records geeks they probably have a wide variety of options anyway in this range. For sport whatever floats your boat, but 5 choices vs. 1.
Jerry
For this record geek, it's basically the 4th motor in the large end of 38mm J motors. The other ones are the Loki J1000, Cesaroni J530, and the Cesaroni J420. This one about the same length as the Loki, and has 38 Ns less impulse, but a better burn profile. The CTI loads are significantly shorter with about 19.7" to the front of the motor, vs. about 24.75" to the front end of the forward closure for the new AT case. The J530 has 47 Ns less impulse than this new AT J510.
Oh lord, my 54mm Stealth is gonna be quite happy.
Does the length difference matter? I suppose it is more mass and fits fewer rockets, but anybody who uses thrust rings or builds to limit motor length should be punished anyway.
Jerry
The J99 is cool. I'll be curious to see the thrust curve. It is RAT or something else?
Jerry
The J99 is cool. I'll be curious to see the thrust curve. It is RAT or something else?
The extra 4" of length is relevant for the drag. If you click on the links you can see the thrust curve for the J99. That is a cool motor, with almost a 10 second burn. The total impulse is enough lower than the biggest 38mm Js that it's probably not a record contender, even if the burn duration offsets the frontal area. But it will still be interesting to sim.
But it will still be interesting to sim.
Thanks for the advise. I did simply click on the link now.
I think this is caused not by any grain geometry trick, but by nozzle throat erosion! USR nozzles in 29mm and 38mm motors are good for 2-10 firings where AT nozzles in the same systems with the same propellant are typically only good for 1-2 firings. That interesting tidbit in my brain makes it clear why the thrust curve drops. The throat is eroding!
Just Jerry
I didn't have to wait long to see the first victim of motor length construction limits! 15 minutes.