| AeroTech receives seven new California OSFM approvals |
|
|
|
|
| News Release by AeroTech Consumer Aerospace | |
| Wednesday, February 03, 2010 | |
|
The specific products approved are:
38mm High-Power RMS 54mm High-Power RMS 75mm High-Power RMS 98mm High-Power RMS The approvals allow the sale and use of these rocket motor products by California consumers. A copy of the new California OSFM approvals may be downloaded in PDF format from the Resource Library on the AeroTech website at http://www.aerotech-rocketry.com. AeroTech Consumer Aerospace has a page on Facebook! Follow the very latest AeroTech news, information, product developments and testing at http://www.facebook.com/pages/AeroTech-Consumer-Aerospace/159005948954 AeroTech Consumer Aerospace is a division of RCS Rocket Motor Components, Inc., Cedar City, UT. |
| << Previous Article | Next Article >> |
|---|
IT would be practical for each vendor to make a list. You know what would be even better? NAR publishes a NAR/TRA/CAR joint certified motor list. One field could be CSFM.
NAR should absolutely approach CA OSFM to entirely eliminate their MR and HPR regulations, accept NAR certification, or DOT article approval, as its standard of acceptance, and change the rule back that with oral permission from the LOCAL fire authority you can launch rockets or sell rockets.
Backup plan, an initial on a stock letter.
CA sucks and likes it that way!
Jerry
IT would be practical for each vendor to make a list. You know what would be even better? NAR publishes a NAR/TRA/CAR joint certified motor list. One field could be CSFM.
Exactly. That's what I meant by combined list in my post but it wasn't explicit enough. Since we already get information on contest eligibility and other things - why not CSFM? It wouldn't have to be considered binding - a flyer might still need to show the CA OSFM sticker/stamp on their package to the RSO. But the list would be nice to have.
Consider this fact. This suggestion has been made almost each and every year since CSFM adopted a HPR regulation to begin with. Admittedly for several years it was a bit embarrassing that the manufacturer(s) couldn't/didn't pay the fees, or that on one occasion a dealer did the process for them, or that the office themselves didn't really think through what to do after the regulations were adopted.
You know who drafted the current California State HPR regulations, for the most part? The MODEL ROCKET caucus to make HPR harder to do and less accessable. Mary Roberts and Dane Boles.
All CSFM would have had to do is ask ONLY HPR vendors to assist with HPR code, and keep the anti-HPR MR folks out of it. It probably didn't help much Charles Rogers got on that committee with a stated purpose of advocating the Teleflite (amateur rocket) position, only to both kill that and kill HPR in favor of the MR caucus.
Listen carefully. It's ALL politics. To you folks coming to LDRS in lovely California, welcome to California, the golden state. NOW GO HOME. Go to Disneyland first, we need the money.
Just Jerry
Arnold wants the fees paid to OSFM, but he could care less about the actual motors they are are "approving".